Obama não quer ficar assim…
O título é assim mesmo, sem interrogação. Primeiro, não visa a provocar falso suspense; segundo, sabe-se, pelo menos, porque mataram Kennedy, o que abrevia a questão de quem o fez.
Como não foi acidente, nem obra de Lee Oswald, evidentemente, a questão é por que e não exatamente quem. E a questão vem um tanto a calhar, hoje, quando as finanças testam os limites de tensão da corda.
O Presidente Obama não quer o mesmo fim, portanto cede…
O trecho adiante foi extraído do texto Who Killed JFK, de Dean Henderson e é bastante claro e direto:
Kennedy had angered the US military establishment but his death sentence was signed by the international bankers.
Kennedy had announced a crackdown on off-shore tax havens and proposed increases in tax rates on large oil and mining companies. He supported eliminating tax loopholes which benefit the super-rich. His economic policies were publicly attacked by Fortune magazine, the Wall Street Journal and both David and Nelson Rockefeller. Kennedy’s own Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon, who came from the Bechtel-controlled Dillon Read investment bank, voiced opposition to the JFK proposals. [386]
Kennedy’s fate was sealed in June 1963 when he authorized the issuance of more than $4 billion in United States Notes by his Treasury Department in an attempt to circumvent the high interest rate usury of the Eight Families Federal Reserve international banker crowd. President Lincoln had made a similar move 100 years earlier and suffered the same consequences.
The wife of accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, who was conveniently gunned down by Jack Ruby before Ruby quickly died in prison, told author A. J. Weberman in 1994, “The answer to the Kennedy assassination is with the Federal Reserve Bank. Don’t underestimate that. It’s wrong to blame it on Angleton and the CIA per se only. This is only one finger on the same hand. The people who supply the money are above the CIA”.
É engraçado: hoje o movimento é o mesmo, embora o sentido imediatamente financeiro seja inverso. Quando o dólar era fortíssimo, nominalmente, interessavam os juros internos e desinteressavam as emissões. Hoje, os juros internos podem até ser negativos, mas interessam as emissões, porque há outros juros imensos, externos…